View Full Version : Sparkly vampires VS. british teen wizards
asianpuppy
01-25-2010, 03:29 PM
Harry Potter or Twilight which side r u on? im in the Harry Potter group. VAMPIRES DONT FRICKEN SPARKLE!!
Bakarangerpink
01-25-2010, 06:34 PM
Harry Potter!!! Edward Cullen is blah!!! He lives in the woods and SPARKLES!!! He's no vampire he's a freakin fairy!!!
reddeath
01-25-2010, 10:24 PM
Harry potter don't really like Twilight that much
Kuma-san
01-26-2010, 08:19 AM
Twilight sucked... Harry potter. *bows* Long live voldemort!
Mistress Greene
01-26-2010, 09:27 AM
There's not even a hint of competition..........Harry Potter beats Edward Cullen (in the faise, I might add)
I don't think anyone who likes real vampires would ever pick twilight. Harry Potter is a better story anyways. Many more mystical creatures are in Harry Potter anyways.
reddeath
01-26-2010, 11:08 AM
I don't think anyone who likes real vampires would ever pick twilight. Harry Potter is a better story anyways. Many more mystical creatures are in Harry Potter anyways.
Not only that i think harry potter trys to reach a wider audiance while twilight has a defined set audiance target
That's true. Harry Potter appeals to everyone while twilight is mainly amied at females. Harry Potter has also been around longer and has more action in it. Twilight is primarily a love story.
They just don't compare! Harry Potter ftw >: D
asianpuppy
01-26-2010, 05:54 PM
so... Harry Potter pwns Twilight.
I'm suprised there weren't any massive Twilight supporters around here, considering it's popularity : o
asianpuppy
01-26-2010, 06:52 PM
yes well...this is where most people have read manga/anime (some containing vampires) and know that real vampires dont sparkle. nor look like edward cullen. :)
Mistress Greene
01-26-2010, 07:59 PM
Well, yeah..........Vampires go RAWR and then eat you!!! XD
And plus, Twilight is just a passing fad, while Harry Potter is FOREVER!
fire19
01-26-2010, 09:35 PM
I'm suprised there weren't any massive Twilight supporters around here, considering it's popularity : o
yehh but its mostly popular with tweens, teeny boppers and crazy fan girls...i think everyone here is above that =.=
Which makes me happy : )
Haha I'm not really into vampires so I don't mind so much the sparklyness its manly the overall crappiness of the book and the overrated-ness of it that bothers me.
Mistress Greene
01-27-2010, 09:31 AM
yehh but its mostly popular with tweens, teeny boppers and crazy fan girls...i think everyone here is above that =.=
lol.......I'm thirteen and in that category, I believe.... but I still think Harry beats Edward in the faise..
Bakarangerpink
01-27-2010, 11:59 AM
My vampires dont sparkle...or they wouldnt if I had vampires
I've never met a sparkly vampire. If i ever did met one I'd kill him and bury him some where people would never find him. Vampires don't sparkle and it should stay that way.
reddeath
01-27-2010, 04:30 PM
Ye it is the first time that i have seen vampires that sparkle
I mean they are supose to be able to blend in so that they can feed easly whats they point in beening a hunter if a bit of light shows what you are
asianpuppy
01-27-2010, 05:00 PM
true but keep in mind they normally werent made to hunt an eat animals ( in twilight). they r suppose to be "good looking" so that they can lure in their prey ( which are humans).
reddeath
01-27-2010, 05:06 PM
true but keep in mind they normally werent made to hunt an eat animals ( in twilight). they r suppose to be "good looking" so that they can lure in their prey ( which are humans).
Yes that is true but if they sparkle anybbody would know something wasn't right and get out of there
asianpuppy
01-27-2010, 05:11 PM
Yes that is true but if they sparkle anybbody would know something wasn't right and get out of there
true true. which is one of the reasons as to why they attack at night.
fire19
01-27-2010, 08:53 PM
all this twilight fandom is an insult to the vampire world =(
Ye it is the first time that i have seen vampires that sparkle
I mean they are supose to be able to blend in so that they can feed easly whats they point in beening a hunter if a bit of light shows what you are
The sparkly thing is just a twist on the burning in sunlight thing, just shoved in there so Edward's precious oh-so-beautiful gorgeously perfetly-angled, mind-blowing face doesn't melt ;D Either way traditional vampires can't go out in sunlight, that's why they're creatures of the night.
asianpuppy
01-28-2010, 07:55 AM
wouldnt u think that edwards face would look better melted? just a thought :)
The sparkly thing is just a twist on the burning in sunlight thing, just shoved in there so Edward's precious oh-so-beautiful gorgeously perfetly-angled, mind-blowing face doesn't melt ;D Either way traditional vampires can't go out in sunlight, that's why they're creatures of the night.
It think that given enough time Vampires might be able to endure short pierods of sunlight. They would have to be old enough or give up something to walk in the light though.
wouldnt u think that edwards face would look better melted? just a thought :)
Ten times better ;D
Siri_Leigh
01-29-2010, 11:29 PM
Oh you all seemed to enjoy this topic. I pick neither side never read either books, and only watched the first movie for both. Not so much interesterd in Harry Potter or Twilight.
kodocha_lover
01-30-2010, 08:54 PM
i'm not interested in either of them.
ChoujiSempai
02-03-2010, 10:24 PM
Vampires rule!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.8 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.